<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RailsPlugins.net launched</title>
	<atom:link href="http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2007/05/18/railspluginsnet-launched/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2007/05/18/railspluginsnet-launched/</link>
	<description>Ecchi nanowa ikenai to omoimasu</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:05:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hongli</title>
		<link>http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2007/05/18/railspluginsnet-launched/comment-page-1/#comment-6490</link>
		<dc:creator>Hongli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 19:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/?p=45#comment-6490</guid>
		<description>Actually I made this site because I didn&#039;t know about agilewebdevelopment.com :/ Oh well, it was a good exercise. At least now I can use it to impress my non-Ruby on Rails-using friends by telling them that I made this in less than 24 hours. :)

Thanks for the concern. Right now I&#039;m kinda stuck though, the discussion seems to have halted and I don&#039;t know why, or whether the core team is interested. I spoke to some people on #rubyonrails and they said that I shouldn&#039;t try to send patches and that I should write a plugin instead, and that that&#039;s how people contribute to Rails - by creating plugins instead of patches. But since my changes dive deep into ActiveRecord internals I&#039;d rather submit a patch. I was told &quot;who cares, it&#039;s Ruby, patching methods is easy&quot; but I don&#039;t agree with that. Just because something is easy and possible doesn&#039;t mean that it should be done.
The people on rubyonrails-core also seem to be somewhat skeptical about the advantages of prepared statements. Right now I&#039;m looking for benchmarks and hard evidence that prove the use of prepared statements is advantageous, but so far I can&#039;t seem to find any. Many people outside the Ruby on Rails world say that prepared statements are faster and that one should use them, but I&#039;m really having a hard time finding hard evidence to back up that claim. If you know any, I would greatly appreciate it if you could tell me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I made this site because I didn&#8217;t know about agilewebdevelopment.com :/ Oh well, it was a good exercise. At least now I can use it to impress my non-Ruby on Rails-using friends by telling them that I made this in less than 24 hours. <img src='http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for the concern. Right now I&#8217;m kinda stuck though, the discussion seems to have halted and I don&#8217;t know why, or whether the core team is interested. I spoke to some people on #rubyonrails and they said that I shouldn&#8217;t try to send patches and that I should write a plugin instead, and that that&#8217;s how people contribute to Rails &#8211; by creating plugins instead of patches. But since my changes dive deep into ActiveRecord internals I&#8217;d rather submit a patch. I was told &#8220;who cares, it&#8217;s Ruby, patching methods is easy&#8221; but I don&#8217;t agree with that. Just because something is easy and possible doesn&#8217;t mean that it should be done.<br />
The people on rubyonrails-core also seem to be somewhat skeptical about the advantages of prepared statements. Right now I&#8217;m looking for benchmarks and hard evidence that prove the use of prepared statements is advantageous, but so far I can&#8217;t seem to find any. Many people outside the Ruby on Rails world say that prepared statements are faster and that one should use them, but I&#8217;m really having a hard time finding hard evidence to back up that claim. If you know any, I would greatly appreciate it if you could tell me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2007/05/18/railspluginsnet-launched/comment-page-1/#comment-6489</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 16:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/?p=45#comment-6489</guid>
		<description>Personally the thought of a &#039;fork&#039; of http://agilewebdevelopment.com/plugins kind of bothers me.  Right now it&#039;s the one central place to register and find plugins.  If people start to adopt this new one then it&#039;s just two places I have to look.  I&#039;d much rather see feature requests go to Ben.  The site is actually quite usable already, but maybe it could be improved.

Also, Hongli, you&#039;re doing some awesome work with ActiveRecord and other core issues which I&#039;d hate to see slow down for a side project such as this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally the thought of a &#8216;fork&#8217; of <a href="http://agilewebdevelopment.com/plugins" rel="nofollow">http://agilewebdevelopment.com/plugins</a> kind of bothers me.  Right now it&#8217;s the one central place to register and find plugins.  If people start to adopt this new one then it&#8217;s just two places I have to look.  I&#8217;d much rather see feature requests go to Ben.  The site is actually quite usable already, but maybe it could be improved.</p>
<p>Also, Hongli, you&#8217;re doing some awesome work with ActiveRecord and other core issues which I&#8217;d hate to see slow down for a side project such as this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2007/05/18/railspluginsnet-launched/comment-page-1/#comment-6488</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 15:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/?p=45#comment-6488</guid>
		<description>I run a site http://rubyfurnace.com/ that has been doing basically this as an aggregate of agilewebdev and the same type of thing for rubygems for several months now.   Very cool stuff.  I would most definitely recommend looking at agilewebdevelopment.com/plugins though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run a site <a href="http://rubyfurnace.com/" rel="nofollow">http://rubyfurnace.com/</a> that has been doing basically this as an aggregate of agilewebdev and the same type of thing for rubygems for several months now.   Very cool stuff.  I would most definitely recommend looking at agilewebdevelopment.com/plugins though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2007/05/18/railspluginsnet-launched/comment-page-1/#comment-6487</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 15:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/?p=45#comment-6487</guid>
		<description>You know, http://agilewebdevelopment.com/plugins do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, <a href="http://agilewebdevelopment.com/plugins" rel="nofollow">http://agilewebdevelopment.com/plugins</a> do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
