<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rails deployment a solved problem? Just upload &#038; it works?</title>
	<link>http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/20/rails-deployment-a-solved-problem-just-upload-it-works/</link>
	<description>Ecchi nanowa ikenai to omoimasu</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clever::Tagline::Pending &#187; Painless Rails Deployment</title>
		<link>http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/20/rails-deployment-a-solved-problem-just-upload-it-works/#comment-7974</link>
		<dc:creator>Clever::Tagline::Pending &#187; Painless Rails Deployment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/20/rails-deployment-a-solved-problem-just-upload-it-works/#comment-7974</guid>
		<description>[...] you can! Well, technically only the people at Phusion can at this moment. Lai Hongli breaks the news about modrails, complete with requisite cool [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] you can! Well, technically only the people at Phusion can at this moment. Lai Hongli breaks the news about modrails, complete with requisite cool [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ninh</title>
		<link>http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/20/rails-deployment-a-solved-problem-just-upload-it-works/#comment-7960</link>
		<dc:creator>Ninh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/20/rails-deployment-a-solved-problem-just-upload-it-works/#comment-7960</guid>
		<description>@Mike:
According to our own benchmarks, it seems to be slightly faster than Mongrel. Overall however, the performance seems to be pretty much the same.

@que:
Well, maybe it's time for people who feel that way to move to technologies e.g. J2EE then ;). Remember, Rails was built with pragmatism in mind, and Passenger was built with the same intent... If anything, we perfectly complement Rails with Passenger, and I really don't understand what the big fuss is all about, i.e. I never thought that the possibility of bringing Rails to a greater amount of people would actually be considered to be a bad thing. Regardless of that, Passenger simplifies deployment a _great_ deal, so if not for them (i.e. Railz0rs), it's for your own personal leasure/sanity ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike:<br />
According to our own benchmarks, it seems to be slightly faster than Mongrel. Overall however, the performance seems to be pretty much the same.</p>
<p>@que:<br />
Well, maybe it&#8217;s time for people who feel that way to move to technologies e.g. J2EE then ;). Remember, Rails was built with pragmatism in mind, and Passenger was built with the same intent&#8230; If anything, we perfectly complement Rails with Passenger, and I really don&#8217;t understand what the big fuss is all about, i.e. I never thought that the possibility of bringing Rails to a greater amount of people would actually be considered to be a bad thing. Regardless of that, Passenger simplifies deployment a _great_ deal, so if not for them (i.e. Railz0rs), it&#8217;s for your own personal leasure/sanity <img src='http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: que</title>
		<link>http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/20/rails-deployment-a-solved-problem-just-upload-it-works/#comment-7959</link>
		<dc:creator>que</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/20/rails-deployment-a-solved-problem-just-upload-it-works/#comment-7959</guid>
		<description>Mod Rails for Apache: hordes of idiots are now professional Rail0rz
http://novemberain.com/2008/3/20/mod_rails_for_apache</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mod Rails for Apache: hordes of idiots are now professional Rail0rz<br />
<a href="http://novemberain.com/2008/3/20/mod_rails_for_apache" rel="nofollow">http://novemberain.com/2008/3/20/mod_rails_for_apache</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Urquhart</title>
		<link>http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/20/rails-deployment-a-solved-problem-just-upload-it-works/#comment-7958</link>
		<dc:creator>James Urquhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/20/rails-deployment-a-solved-problem-just-upload-it-works/#comment-7958</guid>
		<description>Sounds great. I look forward to seeing the usual barrage of benchmarks and comparisons once this kicks off! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds great. I look forward to seeing the usual barrage of benchmarks and comparisons once this kicks off! <img src='http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/20/rails-deployment-a-solved-problem-just-upload-it-works/#comment-7957</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://izumi.plan99.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/20/rails-deployment-a-solved-problem-just-upload-it-works/#comment-7957</guid>
		<description>Can you provide us with some benchmarks?  How does this compare with Litespeed, Mongrel, Ebb, &#38; Thin?

Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you provide us with some benchmarks?  How does this compare with Litespeed, Mongrel, Ebb, &amp; Thin?</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
