Comments for 赖洪礼的 blog

Comment on Benchmark: Passenger (mod_rails) vs Mongrel vs Thin by LRGeek » Phusion’s mod_rails not so hot according to Railsplayground

LRGeek » Phusion’s mod_rails not so hot according to Railsplayground — Thu, 15 May 2008 16:12:14 +0000

[…] providers using shared hosting, or just anyone looking for an easy Rails deployment behind Apache. Performance benchmarks for the project seeme promising (a bit better than mongrel). However, when I asked to launch an […]

Comment on Benchmark: Passenger (mod_rails) vs Mongrel vs Thin by Art

Art — Tue, 13 May 2008 21:16:24 +0000

Nice work and nice benchmark. - Maybe you can rerun the benchmark with a reduced number of mongrels ? (As suggested by Mike Judge, March 31, 2008 @ 5:46 pm)

Can’t wait to try it myself

Comment on Passenger and other Ruby frameworks by Eivind Uggedal

Eivind Uggedal — Tue, 13 May 2008 21:05:29 +0000

Have you heard about Rack? mod_rack?

Comment on Ruby vs PHP performance by mx_

mx_ — Mon, 12 May 2008 16:49:48 +0000

Hogli,

Arjen pointed out the biggest flaw of your test. I’m not rooting for either language, I’m using both where appropriate. However using php’s count() on every loop iteration so many times is a horrible mistake, which renders the benchmark meaningless. I suggest updating your tests (and some of the conclusions).

Comment on Benchmark: Passenger (mod_rails) vs Mongrel vs Thin by Using Capistrano with Passenger (mod_rails) | Jim Neath

Using Capistrano with Passenger (mod_rails) | Jim Neath — Sat, 10 May 2008 09:40:36 +0000

[…] Benchmark: Passenger (mod_rails) vs Mongrel vs Thin […]

Comment on Does Ruby have a distribution problem? by Nome do Jogo » Artigo » Rails Podcast Brasil - Epis�dio 16

Nome do Jogo » Artigo » Rails Podcast Brasil - Epis�dio 16 — Fri, 09 May 2008 16:17:56 +0000

[…] Does Ruby have a distribution problem? […]

Comment on Benchmark: Passenger (mod_rails) vs Mongrel vs Thin by links for 2008-05-09 « Mike Does Tech

links for 2008-05-09 « Mike Does Tech — Fri, 09 May 2008 00:44:16 +0000

[…] 赖洪礼的 blog » Benchmark: Passenger (mod_rails) vs Mongrel vs Thin (tags: rails rubyonrails mongrel mod_rails apache deployment) […]

Comment on Does Ruby have a distribution problem? by Donavan

Donavan — Thu, 08 May 2008 12:43:03 +0000

@kaj

What kind of package are you trying to make? I was able to build an RPM for openSUSE with a simple gem install using –install-dir and –bindir, then running rake to generate the Apache module. I simply bypassed the script because it was unnecessary, and used the same system the script uses, sans all the autodetection routines.

Comment on Does Ruby have a distribution problem? by Kaj

Kaj — Thu, 08 May 2008 10:34:43 +0000

@Donavan

Thanks for the -install-dir, -bindir tip, wasn’t aware of those at all.

@Hongli

It would be nice if there was a way of doing everything manually instead of the packager (me) attempting to reverse engineer the install script and check for any changes in install logic on version upgrades.

Comment on Does Ruby have a distribution problem? by Donavan

Donavan — Thu, 08 May 2008 00:30:43 +0000

@kaj

RubyGems support build-root style installations. gem install –install-dir and –bindir will do the equivalent of Markus’s old buildroot patch, and fits a little better with the Gems way of doing things.

@Hongli

Actually, that might not be as hard as you think. The openSUSE build service let’s you use a single spec and control file to build native packages for tons of different distributions. I built a passenger RPM on lots of the SUSE variants this exact way, and it’s almost brain dead simple to do. If you want, I can expand the distros I build for and become a default package maintainer for this.

Thanks!